Transversality: Representation

Teacher(s)

Houdé Joelle; Raucent Marie-Christine; Vilet Guénola;

Language

French

Main themes

The aim of the ‘transversality’ courses is to bridge the approaches from the theoretical courses and from the design studios through operative concepts, reference analyses and investigation methods.
The course explores the connections between modes of representation and the intentions behind the architectural project.

Learning outcomes

At the end of this learning unit, the student is able to :

Master the codes and language specific to the discipline, Analyze and describe an architectural approach, Select the appropriate means of representation to convey an intention, Represent it accurately and meticulously. General Learning Outcomes In line with the program’s learning outcomes (LOs), this course contributes to the development and acquisition of the following LOs: LO1.1 Identify the parameters and issues of a given situation. LO1.2 State the intentions and choices of an architectural project at different intervention scales. LO2.2 Proficiently depict an architectural concept. LO2.4 Proficiently illustrate construction logics. LO2.5 Proficiently represent a creative process.

Bibliography

CHING F.D.K. (2005). Dessin de design architectural. Québec : Thomson.
DURAND J.-P. (2003). La représentation du projet. Approche pratique et critique. Paris : La Villette (coll. École d'architecture de Grenoble).
FLOCON A. & TATON R. (1963). La perspective. Paris : PUF (coll. Que-sais-je ?).
LAPRADE A. (1920-50). Les carnets d’architecture d’Albert Laprade. Paris : Kubik, éd.2006.
LEBAHAR J.Ch. (1983). Le dessin d'architecte : Simulation graphique et réduction d'incertitude. Paris : Parenthèses.
PAULY D. (2006). Le Corbusier : Le dessin comme outil. Nancy : Fage.
PANOFSKY E. (1976). La perspective comme forme symbolique. Paris : Minuit.

Faculty or entity

> LOCI