Teacher(s)
Language
French Belgian Sign Language
Learning outcomes
At the end of this learning unit, the student is able to : | |
| On completing this Unit the student should:- Without a dictionary, understand a text in simple LSFB simple (history, simple information, simple sentences); - Extract the key information from such a text and transfer and convey them in the target language; - Answer general and specific questions on these texts; - Have enriched their lexicon in terms of both current usage and a range of topics - Use basic translation tools; - Analyse, compare and comment critically with reference to relevant theory on the translations of simple texts. |
|
Content
The written language proficiency course will focus on text comprehension, an approach to lexicology, and an introduction to translation.
Emphasis will be placed on understanding signed messages.
To familiarize students with the Deaf community, they will be required to complete a portfolio to be submitted by the last class of the second semester.
Emphasis will be placed on understanding signed messages.
To familiarize students with the Deaf community, they will be required to complete a portfolio to be submitted by the last class of the second semester.
Teaching methods
The written language proficiency course will focus on text comprehension, an approach to lexicology, and an introduction to translation.
Emphasis will be placed on understanding signed messages.
To familiarize students with the Deaf community, they will be required to complete a portfolio to be submitted by the last class of the second semester.
Emphasis will be placed on understanding signed messages.
To familiarize students with the Deaf community, they will be required to complete a portfolio to be submitted by the last class of the second semester.
Evaluation methods
Interim assessment (30%): text-video comprehension test (non-verbal, verbal, and descriptive expression) and a test assessing the lexicology section.
Final assessment (70%): text-video comprehension test (40%), introduction to translation test (30%), and a test assessing the lexicology section, and 30% for the portfolio.
Class attendance is mandatory. Absence from more than 1/3 of the sessions or unjustified failure to submit 1/3 of the written work within the prescribed deadline will result in refusal of registration for the exam.
Final assessment (70%): text-video comprehension test (40%), introduction to translation test (30%), and a test assessing the lexicology section, and 30% for the portfolio.
Class attendance is mandatory. Absence from more than 1/3 of the sessions or unjustified failure to submit 1/3 of the written work within the prescribed deadline will result in refusal of registration for the exam.
Other information
Course Materials :
-Videos in LSFB
-PowerPoint documents.
-List of basic translation tools.
-Videos in LSFB
-PowerPoint documents.
-List of basic translation tools.
Online resources
MOSI
LSFB.BE
corpuslsfb.be
elix-lsf.fr
LSFB.BE
corpuslsfb.be
elix-lsf.fr
Bibliography
- LEDERER M et SOLESKOVITCH D, Interpréter pour traduire, Les Belles Lettres, 2014
- OUSTINOFF M, La traduction, Poche, 2003
- GACHE P, Traduction français écrit-langue des signes vidéos, Éditions universitaires européennes, 2005
- CUXAC C. La langue des signes française: les voies de l'iconicité, 2000, Paris: Ophrys
- CUXAC C. : UNE MANIÈRE DE REFORMULER EN LANGUE DES SIGNES FRANÇAISE. Université de Paris VIIIUMR 7023; p 117-128 La linguistique 2007/1 vol. 43
- MOTTEZ B, Les Sourds existent-ils ?, Paris, L'Harmattan, 2006
- DELAPORTE Y, Les sourds, c'est comme ça, Paris, Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l'homme, 2002
- MILLET A., Grammaire descriiptive. De la langue des signes française : dynamiques iconiques et linguistiques générales; UGA Editions, 2019
- FRANCOIS D, HULIN I, JAMART M-T, Du signe à la plume, Presses universitaires de Namur, Presses universitaires Saint-Louis, Namur, 2017
- OUSTINOFF M, La traduction, Poche, 2003
- GACHE P, Traduction français écrit-langue des signes vidéos, Éditions universitaires européennes, 2005
- CUXAC C. La langue des signes française: les voies de l'iconicité, 2000, Paris: Ophrys
- CUXAC C. : UNE MANIÈRE DE REFORMULER EN LANGUE DES SIGNES FRANÇAISE. Université de Paris VIIIUMR 7023; p 117-128 La linguistique 2007/1 vol. 43
- MOTTEZ B, Les Sourds existent-ils ?, Paris, L'Harmattan, 2006
- DELAPORTE Y, Les sourds, c'est comme ça, Paris, Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l'homme, 2002
- MILLET A., Grammaire descriiptive. De la langue des signes française : dynamiques iconiques et linguistiques générales; UGA Editions, 2019
- FRANCOIS D, HULIN I, JAMART M-T, Du signe à la plume, Presses universitaires de Namur, Presses universitaires Saint-Louis, Namur, 2017
Faculty or entity
Programmes / formations proposant cette unité d'enseignement (UE)
Title of the programme
Sigle
Credits
Prerequisites
Learning outcomes
Bachelor in Translation and Interpreting
