Archive des événements passés du site Chaire Hoover d'éthique économique et sociale
You are viewing All events
-
Coronavirus E-Mich #5 -«What is at stake for Africa ?»21 AprMardi intime de la Chaire Hoover par Kebadu Mekonnen (Addis Abeba) & Thierry Ngosso (Yaounde/St Gallen) Coronavirus: what is at stake for Africa? Should African countries follow by the letter the WHO guidelines in response to Covid-19?En savoir plusCoronavirus E-Mich #5 -«What is at stake for Africa ?»21 AprMardi intime de la Chaire Hoover par Kebadu Mekonnen (Addis Abeba) & Thierry Ngosso (Yaounde/St Gallen) Coronavirus: what is at stake for Africa? Should African countries follow by the letter the WHO guidelines in response to Covid-19?
-
Coronavirus E-Mich #4 -“Covid-19-related geolocation: ranking goals, comparing methods”14 AprMardi intime de la Chaire Hoover par Axel Gosseries & Olivier Pereira We present the key goals that Covid-19 geolocation data collection could pursue. We discuss how to rank them.En savoir plusCoronavirus E-Mich #4 -“Covid-19-related geolocation: ranking goals, comparing methods”14 AprMardi intime de la Chaire Hoover par Axel Gosseries & Olivier Pereira We present the key goals that Covid-19 geolocation data collection could pursue. We discuss how to rank them.
-
Coronavirus E-Mich #3 -“Quels troubles sociaux prévisibles?”07 AprMardi intime de la Chaire Hoover par Jean-Michel Chaumont Les mesures prise contre la pandémie peuvent-elles conduire à une guerre civile? La question de la recevabilité sociale des mesures prises contre la pandémie est capitale.En savoir plusCoronavirus E-Mich #3 -“Quels troubles sociaux prévisibles?”07 AprMardi intime de la Chaire Hoover par Jean-Michel Chaumont Les mesures prise contre la pandémie peuvent-elles conduire à une guerre civile? La question de la recevabilité sociale des mesures prises contre la pandémie est capitale.
-
Coronavirus E-Mich #2 -"Inégalités révélées, inégalités renforcées ?"31 Mar"Coronavirus : inégalités révélées, inégalités renforcées ?" Philippe Defeyt nous entretiendra des effets distributifs du confinement et de la pandémie, en pointant probablement aussi vers quelques pistes de politiques : Coronavirus et redistribution des revenusEn savoir plusCoronavirus E-Mich #2 -"Inégalités révélées, inégalités renforcées ?"31 Mar"Coronavirus : inégalités révélées, inégalités renforcées ?" Philippe Defeyt nous entretiendra des effets distributifs du confinement et de la pandémie, en pointant probablement aussi vers quelques pistes de politiques : Coronavirus et redistribution des revenus
-
“Fair Inheritance - Research in Progress Workshop #1”27 Mar9:00-9:30: coffee reception 1st session: D.144 (Salle Rousseau), Bâtiment Dupriez Chair: Nathalie Schryvers - 9:30-10:25: Daniel Halliday, “Immigration and Inheritance” Respondent: Manuel Valente - 10:25-10:40: break - 10:40-11:35: Grégory Ponthière, “An age-based tax on inheritance” Respondent: Eric Fabri - 11:35-12:30: Edoardo Traversa, “Taxing Inheritance Without Inheritance Tax” RespondenEn savoir plus“Fair Inheritance - Research in Progress Workshop #1”27 Mar9:00-9:30: coffee reception 1st session: D.144 (Salle Rousseau), Bâtiment Dupriez Chair: Nathalie Schryvers - 9:30-10:25: Daniel Halliday, “Immigration and Inheritance” Respondent: Manuel Valente - 10:25-10:40: break - 10:40-11:35: Grégory Ponthière, “An age-based tax on inheritance” Respondent: Eric Fabri - 11:35-12:30: Edoardo Traversa, “Taxing Inheritance Without Inheritance Tax” Responden
-
Coronavirus E-Mich #1 "Confinement contre immunité collective ?"24 Mar"Lutter contre le coronavirus : confinement contre immunité collective ?" par Maxime Lambrecht (Vidéo) SlidesEn savoir plusCoronavirus E-Mich #1 "Confinement contre immunité collective ?"24 Mar"Lutter contre le coronavirus : confinement contre immunité collective ?" par Maxime Lambrecht (Vidéo) Slides
-
Mich: Hard Choices: Neither Parity, Nor Incommensurability, Nor Incomparability10 MarAkshath Jitendranath (J.S. Mill College, Free University Amsterdam) Hard Choices: Neither Parity, Nor Incommensurability, Nor Incomparability Taking what Isaac Levi and Ruth Chang call hard choices as my point of departure, I present a comprehensive and systematic critique of the contemporary philosophical discussion of this phenomena.En savoir plusMich: Hard Choices: Neither Parity, Nor Incommensurability, Nor Incomparability10 MarAkshath Jitendranath (J.S. Mill College, Free University Amsterdam) Hard Choices: Neither Parity, Nor Incommensurability, Nor Incomparability Taking what Isaac Levi and Ruth Chang call hard choices as my point of departure, I present a comprehensive and systematic critique of the contemporary philosophical discussion of this phenomena.
-
ARC Seminar : Reciprocity versus Redistribution: The Case for Collective Pensions06 MarMichael Otsuka (LSE) Presentation 35’ and debate Reciprocity vs. redistribution: The Case for Collective PensionsEn savoir plusARC Seminar : Reciprocity versus Redistribution: The Case for Collective Pensions06 MarMichael Otsuka (LSE) Presentation 35’ and debate Reciprocity vs. redistribution: The Case for Collective Pensions
-
Mich : Automatic Adjustment Mechanisms in Pension Reforms: how to implement them?03 MarKevin Hartmann (UCLouvain) In the last 20 years, pension reforms have included the implementation of mechanisms that externalize the decision of altering the parameters of a pension system from the political decision. These are the Automatic Adjustment Mechanisms (AAM).En savoir plusMich : Automatic Adjustment Mechanisms in Pension Reforms: how to implement them?03 MarKevin Hartmann (UCLouvain) In the last 20 years, pension reforms have included the implementation of mechanisms that externalize the decision of altering the parameters of a pension system from the political decision. These are the Automatic Adjustment Mechanisms (AAM).
-
Mich : Deprivation, Provocation and Punishment25 FebAndrei Poama (Leiden University) All things equal, it seems wrong that offenders who are unjustly subject to socio-economic deprivations are held criminally responsible and subsequently punished the same as non-deprived offenders. This paper argues that, particularly for paradigmatic cases, unjust socio-economic deprivation grounds a wrongful social provocation (WSP) defense.En savoir plusMich : Deprivation, Provocation and Punishment25 FebAndrei Poama (Leiden University) All things equal, it seems wrong that offenders who are unjustly subject to socio-economic deprivations are held criminally responsible and subsequently punished the same as non-deprived offenders. This paper argues that, particularly for paradigmatic cases, unjust socio-economic deprivation grounds a wrongful social provocation (WSP) defense.