Video game analysis

lcomu2669  2026-2027  Louvain-la-Neuve

Video game analysis
4.00 credits
22.5 h
Q2
Teacher(s)
Language
French
Content
This course offers an introduction to game studies and the critical analysis of [video] games as cultural and media objects. It is structured around three main areas:
  1. An introduction to the scientific literature on game studies, with a particular focus on fundamental theories and concepts.
  2. An exploration of methods for analyzing [video] games, including critical, structural, and playful approaches.
  3. Practical application of analytical skills through case studies of specific [video] games.
Sessions will combine theoretical presentations, discussions, practical activities, and collaborative activities.
By the end of this course, students will be able to:
  1. Critically analyse [video] games using theoretical concepts (level: evaluation).
  2. Apply methods for analysing [video] games to draw relevant conclusions (level: application).
  3. Compile a relevant academic bibliography on a topic related to game studies (level: synthesis).
  4. Collaborate with peers to propose comparative analyses and co-author an article of academic quality but written in accessible language (level: collaboration).
  5. Communicate a well-reasoned critical analysis through various formats (e.g. video and academic article) (level: creation).
Teaching methods
Overview: an introduction to the main journals and research in video game analysis from various perspectives (aesthetic, narrative, mechanistic, educational, UX/UI, etc.)
Reading and critical analysis: students will read academic articles on [video] games and take part in class discussions.
Playades: Students will produce two video analyses of [video] games.
Collaborative bibliography: Creation of a collaborative bibliography (on Zotero).
Final assignment (group work):
  • Writing a short article inspired by the approaches set out in the book *Introduction to Video Game Theories*, co-edited by Sébastien Genvo and Thibault Philippette.
  • This assignment will build on previous work, namely the ‘playades’ as case studies, as well as the collaborative bibliography for key references.
Evaluation methods
  1. Continuous individual assessment (50%): completion of two video analyses (“playade”) of [video] games.
  2. Final group assignment (50%):
    • An academic article on a chosen cross-cutting theme, structured as follows (see articles in Introduction to Video Game Theories)
      • Theoretical introduction
      • several case studies (based in particular on the Playade analyses)
      • Conclusion
      • Annotated bibliography (based on the collaborative bibliography)
      • “Further reading” (additional resources)
    • Note: a negative individual weighting may be applied in the event of a lack of commitment to the work.
In the second session, students must resubmit all work that was not submitted or failed. Furthermore, the final assignment must be completed individually.
Other information
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)
The use of generative AIs (such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or others) is governed by the principles of responsibility, transparency and authenticity:
  1. Authorized use without mention: Students may use generative AIs for linguistic assistance tasks, such as grammatical or spelling correction, reformulation and translation. However, the tool must not add content not authored by the student.
  2. Authorized use with compulsory mention: If a student uses AI-generated content (text, image, etc.) or translates text directly via an AI without substantial revision, this must be explicitly mentioned in the assignment, in accordance with academic citation rules.
  3. Prohibited use: Any use of an AI that prevents verification or assessment of the student's personal learning is prohibited. This includes the unmentioned use of AI-generated content or the submission of work where the AI has produced a significant proportion of the content without human review.
Students must keep records of interactions with AIs in case of audit. Any failure to comply with these rules may be considered an academic irregularity and subject to the sanctions set out in the general regulations governing studies and examinations (RGEE (in French) Règlement général des études et des examens | UCLouvain).
If in doubt, UCLouvain’s official guidelines on the use of AI can be found here: https://uclouvain.be/en/ai/documents
Online resources
See Moodle
Bibliography
Alvarez, J., & Djaouti, D. (2010). An introduction to serious game design: Using gameplay bricks to design meaningful games. Ludoscience. http://www.ludoscience.com/EN/publications/21-An-introduction-to-serious-game-design-using-gameplay-bricks-to-design-meaningful-games.html
Bonenfant, M. (2017). Pour une approche communicationnelle des jeux vidéo : quelques enjeux théoriques et méthodologiques. Sciences du jeu, 7. https://journals.openedition.org/sdj/873
Consalvo, M., & Dutton, N. (2006). Game analysis: Developing a methodological toolkit for the qualitative study of games. Game Studies, 6(1). http://www.gamestudies.org/0601/articles/consalvo_dutton
Fernández-Vara, C. (2015). Introduction to game analysis. Routledge.
Flanagan, M., & Nissenbaum, H. (2014). Values at play in digital games. MIT Press.
Genvo, S., & Philippette, T. (Éd.). (2020). Introduction aux théories des jeux vidéo. Presses universitaires de Liège. https://books.openedition.org/pulg/26119
Genvo, S. (2013). Le game design de jeux vidéo : Approches de l'expression vidéoludique. L'Harmattan.
Juul, J. (2005). Half-real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. MIT Press.
Juul, J. (2013). The art of failure: An essay on the pain of playing video games. MIT Press.
Lejacq, Y. (2015). Le concept de retrogaming : Pratiques et identités au croisement de l’histoire et de la culture du jeu vidéo. Sciences du jeu, 3. https://journals.openedition.org/sdj/394
Montembault, A. (2018). L’accessibilité des jeux vidéo : Dispositifs, acteurs et conception. Sciences du jeu, 9. https://journals.openedition.org/sdj/1463
Rufat, S. (2012). La ville dans les jeux vidéo : Regards croisés sur la production vidéoludique. Sciences du jeu, 1. https://journals.openedition.org/sdj/144
Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press.
Sicart, M. (2014). Play matters. MIT Press.
Sicart, M. (2009). The ethics of computer games. MIT Press.
Taylor, T. L. (2006). Play between worlds: Exploring online game culture. MIT Press.
Taylor, T. L. (2009). Communities of play: Emergent cultures in multiplayer games and virtual worlds. MIT Press.
Triclot, M. (2011). Philosophie des jeux vidéo. Zones.
Whalen, Z., & Taylor, L. N. (Eds.). (2008). Playing the past: History and nostalgia in video games. Vanderbilt University Press.
Wolf, M. J. P., & Perron, B. (Eds.). (2003). The video game theory reader. Routledge.
Zagal, J. P. (2010). Ludoliteracy: Defining, understanding, and supporting games education. ETC Press.
Zagal, J. P., Fernández-Vara, C., & Mateas, M. (2007). Rethinking immersion: Narrative causality and consistency in the attention economy. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 1(1), 14-35. https://doi.org/10.4018/jgcms.2009010102
Teaching materials
  • Introduction aux Théories des Jeux Vidéo (S. Genvo et T. Philippette, dir.)
Faculty or entity


Programmes / formations proposant cette unité d'enseignement (UE)

Title of the programme
Sigle
Credits
Prerequisites
Learning outcomes
Master [120] in Communication

Master [60] in Information and Communication