ILC Louvain-La-Neuve, Mons

This five-year Collective Research Initiative (ARC, 2019-2024) project addresses the challenges of fostering social interactions and socio-cognitive conflicts (i.e. differences in point of view that are socially experienced and cognitively resolved) to promote learning in an online learning platform. With the help of various disciplinary methodological toolkits (content analysis, corpus linguistics, and social media analytics), we investigate the presence and unfolding of socio-cognitive conflicts in the forums of massive open online courses (MOOCs) developed by LouvainX on the edX platform.

MOOC forums are a unique environment where learners with different professional experience and cultural backgrounds are invited to discuss disciplinary concepts and/or society issues that can potentially induce socio-cognitive conflicts and/or controversies. We adopt a mixed-method approach and examine the forum discussions from a multidisciplinary perspective that builds on theories from several disciplines from the humanities and social sciences (linguistics, natural language processing, communication sciences, education, and management studies). The sub-projects involved in the MOOCresearch2.0 are:

1. Social interactions, socio-cognitive conflicts and learning

PI: Prof. Mariane Frenay, GIRSEF; PhD candidate: Dennis A. Rivera

This subproject investigates how MOOC learners engage in socio-cognitive conflicts on MOOC discussion forums. It investigates how the MOOC discipline, the instructional context conditions, and the learners’ individual characteristics affect the way in which learners engage in these conflicts; This subproject seeks to develop in-depth understanding of the dynamic process of social learning in MOOCs and pinpoint the possible factors that may trigger the most fruitful socio-cognitive interactions.


2. Essentially contested concepts in social sciences: The case of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)

PI: Prof. Valérie Swaen, LOURIM; PhD candidate: Pauline de Montpellier d'Annevoie

This subproject investigates the preconceptions and understandings that MOOC learners have about Essentially Contested Concepts (ECCs) theough the case of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). It studies how these preconceptions vary with learners’ individual profiles (e.g., socio-demographics, values, experience), and geographical origins. It explores how different pedagogical and communication mechanisms can stimulate content-related debate and facilitate learning about scientific ECCs.


3. The communicative constitution of controversial debates

PI: Prof. François Lambotte, Social Media Lab; PostDoc researcher: Dr. Jan Zienkowski

This subproject delves into the rhetoric of controversies to explore how controversial debates unfold. It considers the relational, sequential and longitudinal construction of stances to analyze typical utterances of controversial debates (e.g., proof, refutation, politeness) and examine how these utterances are triggered, stabilize, transform and close.


4. Socio-cognitive conflicts and negotiating meaning in a foreign language

PI: Prof. Magali Paquot, Centre for English Corpus Linguistics; PhD candidate: Bert Van de Poel

This subproject investigates the differences between native and non-native speakers in the way they communicate online through MOOC discussion forums. Specifically, the project examines (1) whether native and non-native speakers behave similarly, are as present and take similar roles on these forums, (2) whether the contribution of native vs. non-native speakers to discussions mostly concerns language use difficulties, also concerns course content related questions and touches upon cognitive (dis)agreement, and (3) whether a non-native speaker's proficiency level plays a role in these differences.


5. Argumentation and learning

PI: Prof. Mariane Frenay, GIRSEF; PostDoc researcher: Dr. Kenzo Nera

This subproject investigates how argumentation skills affects the quality of interactions on MOOC discussion forums, as well as learning. Specifically, the goal of the subproject is to develop interventions aimed at teaching MOOC learners basics of argumentation knowledge and skills, and to test the efficacy of these interventions. Doing so, the subproject seeks to identify the specificities of MOOC platforms when it comes to the design, implementation, and assessment of argumentation-based interventions.



Contact Person:

Dr. Magali Paquot, project spokesperson


Icons made by Freepik from




NEW | Constraint Programming

Today more than ever, the optimal use of resources has become a very important issue. Many decision problems (logistics, production, space, etc.) aiming at an optimal use of resources can be...

NEW | Introduction to Conflict Management

Conflict management is an essential skill. Any individual who masters it will not only become more efficient in their private and professional life but will also be able to help others with their...

UCLouvain is one of 10 edX grantees!

We’re very proud to announce that our future program “Psychology of Conflict Management” by Prof. Stéphanie Demoulin has been selected by edX’s Essential Human Skills for the Virtual Age...

NEW | Modeling and simulation of multibody systems

Vehicles, bicycles, cranes, human bodies and robots are multibody systems. Learn how to model them and to compute their kinematic and dynamic characteristics, such as velocities, accelerations and...

NEW | Asylum and Refugee Law

What is asylum? What is the principle of non-refoulement? Who should be recognized and protected as a refugee? These questions are both ancient and contemporary. Whether you are a decision...