20/10/2026 Hoover Tuesdays “Relational Recognition and Justifiability to Another in the Moral Nexus”

The Hoover Chair Research Seminar by Jonas Vandieken (LMU)

Any adequate moral theory of ‘what we owe to each other’ better make sense of the idea that we owe each person respect. A moral theory that appears well equipped to account for what I shall call relational recognition respect and the constraint it places on moral deliberation is the relational theory of morality recently developed by R. Jay Wallace in ‘The Moral Nexus’ (2019). I shall argue, however, that Wallace’s own relational proposal is at risk of ultimately falling short of properly accommodating relational recognition respect and the deliberative constraint imposed by it. The reason for this shortfall is Wallace’s adherence to Principle Contractualism as the correct model of relational moral deliberation. According to Principle Contractualism and its central idea of hypothetical justifiability to generic others, claims function at best as outputs of moral deliberation. But relational recognition respect requires not merely that deliberation issue in an obligation owed to a generic another identified as the relevant claim-holder, but that the other’s actual claims figure as inputs into a distinctively relational mode of moral deliberation to determine how they may act. As such, I argue that proponents of a relational moral theory like Wallace should give up on Principle Contractualism without having to give up on moral contractualism as such. A relational moral theory in fact lends itself much closer to a relational version of what has come to be known as Act Contractualism.

13/10/2026 Hoover Tuesdays "Climate Change, Critical Minerals, and Extractivism"

The Hoover Chair Seminar Research by Jamie DRAPER (Utrecht University; Hoover Chair Visiting Fellow)

Decarbonisation is creating significant demand for so-called ‘critical minerals’ such as lithium, cobalt, and copper. These resources are highly valuable in the context of the climate transition, but their extraction also creates significant ecological and social costs and involves exploitative economic arrangements. This appears to create a climate–extractivism dilemma: on the one hand, aggressive climate mitigation appears to come at the cost of imposing significant harms from extractivism; on the other hand, avoiding the harms of extractivism appears to hold back the project of climate mitigation. In this paper, I examine three possible responses to this apparent dilemma from a broadly egalitarian point of view: reducing, onshoring, and reforming extraction. I argue that an egalitarian justice requires a judicious combination of all three, but that reforming is generally preferable to onshoring and reducing extraction, at least where it is feasible and does not conflict with the morally legitimate claims of local communities. But the precise combination of measures that egalitarians should endorse will depend on a set of assumptions about political feasibility and on the claims made by communities on the extractive frontier.

03/11/2026 Hoover Tuesdays "Should Our Fundamental Rights Be Waivable? Some Conceptual and Normative Considerations"

The Hoover Chair Seminar Research by Cécile DEGIOVANNI (Universités Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne)

24/11/2026 Hoover Tuesdays "What Do We Owe to Our Fellow Citizens?"

The Hoover Chair Seminar by Pierre-Étienne VANDAMME (Chaire Hoover)

Presentation of the book Agir face aux injustices. Une éthique de la citoyenneté (Éliott, 2026)

Starting from very concrete questions (Do we have a duty to work? To vote? To obey unjust laws? To share our wealth?), the book examines the mutual obligations arising from social cooperation from the perspective of moral contractualism. Drawing on G. A. Cohen’s defense of an egalitarian ethos, it engages in a form of political moral philosophy, paying close attention to inequality, the social circumstances in which people act, and institutional solutions that facilitate the fulfilment of our moral duties.

15/12/2026 Hoover Tuesdays "Temporally Situated Life Plans"

The Hoover Chair Seminar by Simon VÖHRINGER (Princeton University)

Tout

Événements

Newsletter

Menu

A propos

Personnes

Fellowship

Seminars/Workshops

Resarch projects

Enseignement de l’éthique

20/10/2026 Hoover Tuesdays “Relational Recognition and Justifiability to Another in the Moral Nexus”

13/10/2026 Hoover Tuesdays "Climate Change, Critical Minerals, and Extractivism"

03/11/2026 Hoover Tuesdays "Should Our Fundamental Rights Be Waivable? Some Conceptual and Normative Considerations"

24/11/2026 Hoover Tuesdays "What Do We Owe to Our Fellow Citizens?"

15/12/2026 Hoover Tuesdays "Temporally Situated Life Plans"